Andy Valencia
2018-03-16 03:10:14 UTC
Thank you very much for pointing me at the right bits of existing
standards.
Matthew Wronka's reference of a "canonical relationship" and
RFC6596 is very much on target. rel=canonical should do as much
as I could hope for in any case.
I of course considered an initial landing page, but UX pushes strongly
where the 99.999% case is not the one which should require the extra
click. I'll certainly have the canonical link specified, and hope
for the best. Perhaps even, as you say, submit a ticket to a
browser or two.
Thanks again,
Andy Valencia
standards.
Matthew Wronka's reference of a "canonical relationship" and
RFC6596 is very much on target. rel=canonical should do as much
as I could hope for in any case.
I of course considered an initial landing page, but UX pushes strongly
where the 99.999% case is not the one which should require the extra
click. I'll certainly have the canonical link specified, and hope
for the best. Perhaps even, as you say, submit a ticket to a
browser or two.
Thanks again,
Andy Valencia